Our review process
How submissions are assessed — fairly, independently, and transparently.
Every manuscript is evaluated on its scholarly merit through independent peer review. Here is how a submission moves from arrival to decision.
Independent, criteria-based peer review
Manuscripts are reviewed by qualified referees who assess the work against clear scholarly criteria. Reviewers make recommendations; editors make the final decision, and their decision is based on the quality and integrity of the work rather than its source.
We aim to keep the process constructive: feedback is intended to help authors improve their work, whatever the outcome.
The journey of a submission
Submission check
We confirm the manuscript is complete, in scope, and ready for review.
Editorial assessment
An editor evaluates the manuscript’s fit and quality before review.
Peer review
Independent reviewers assess the work against our criteria.
Revision
Authors respond to reviewer feedback and revise as needed.
Decision
The editor makes a final decision based on the reviews.
Publication
Accepted articles are produced, assigned a DOI, and preserved.
Assessment criteria
Originality
Does the work make a genuine, novel contribution to its field?
Methodology
Are the methods sound, appropriate, and clearly described?
Clarity
Is the work presented clearly, logically, and completely?
Integrity
Does the work meet our ethics and reporting standards?
Have a manuscript ready?
Review the author guidelines, then submit your work for consideration.
